|
|
|
Jackson Trial Lawyers - Fallbrook Personal Injury Attorney
Law Firm News |
2012/08/07 11:22
|
The Law Offices of Robert W. Jackson is a Fallbrook personal injury attorney who has what it takes to represent your unique case. Insurance companies think it is acceptable to bully people with lesser knowledge of the legal system, but we are here to help.
Everyone deserves a fair chance in getting the maximum amount of compensation for their personal injuries. Because the insurance companies are out for business, and not looking for your best interests, it is easy for them to offer less compensation. As trial lawyers, we are not afraid to speak our minds and take action on what we believe is right. Therefore, we never give up on a settlement or trial.
Our Fallbrook Personal Injury Attorney is conveniently located in the San Diego county. Our clients are important to us, and by managing the complex and tedious relationships with insurance companies, medical facilities, and government agencies, it is our top priority to keep our clients at the top.
No one should ever have to settle for less than they deserve. If you have been injured in any type of accident, take the right steps immediately and contact one of our highly skilled Fallbrook personal injury attorneys to discuss your case today at 760-723-1295. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gay marriage ban backers seek Supreme Court review
Headline Legal News |
2012/08/03 16:37
|
Backers of California's ban on same-sex marriages asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday to overrule a federal appeals court that struck down the measure as unconstitutional, a move that means the bitter, four-year court fight over Proposition 8 could soon be resolved.
Lawyers for the coalition of religious conservative groups that sponsored the voter-approved ban petitioned the Supreme Court to review the lower court's finding that the 2008 amendment to the state constitution violated the civil rights of gay and lesbian Californians. The request had been expected since a panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued its 2-1 decision earlier this year.
If the high court declines to take the case, it would clear the way for same-sex marriages to resume in California. Gay couples could get married in the state for several months before Proposition 8 passed, a right the measure was designed to take away. Same-sex couples still have the rights and benefits of marriage controlled by state law if they register as domestic partners.
The divided appeals court panel cited those conditions, which were unique to California at the time, as grounds for striking down the ban as a violation of the U.S. Constitution's promise of equal protection. But it also went out of its way to state it was not saying similar bans in six other states it oversees were inherently unconstitutional.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court orders Chevron to stop drilling for oil
Court Watch |
2012/08/02 16:37
|
A federal court has given Chevron Corp. and driller Transocean Ltd. 30 days to suspend all petroleum drilling and transportation operations in Brazil until the conclusion of investigations into two oil spills off the coast of Rio de Janeiro.
The court says in a statement posted Wednesday on its web site each company will be fined 500 million reals ($244 million) for each day they fail to comply with the suspension.
About 155, 000 gallons of oil crude began seeping from cracks in the ocean floor at the site of a Chevron appraisal well in November. Two weeks later, the National Petroleum Agency said the seepage was under control. But in March, oil again started leaking and Chevron voluntarily suspended production in the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court sides with NJ judges in pension dispute
Court News |
2012/07/27 11:58
|
New Jersey's Supreme Court dealt a partial defeat to one of Gov. Chris Christie's signature legislative accomplishments Tuesday when it ruled that the state's judges don't have to contribute more to their pensions and health benefits. A leading state lawmaker immediately said the battle over the matter would continue.
The narrow 3-2 decision sided with a legal challenge filed last year by a state Superior Court judge in Hudson County who argued that the law imposing the pension and health care benefits changes violated a part of the state constitution that set judges' salaries and said they cannot be reduced.
The justices noted in their ruling that without a corresponding salary increase, the increased contributions would eventually cost judges at least $17,000 annually in take-home pay, amounting to a pay cut of more than 10 percent.
Christie, a Republican, had worked with the Democratic-controlled Legislature to pass the law last year. It affects hundreds of thousands of government workers around the state in addition to between 400 and 500 sitting judges and justices. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Court rejects Florida prison privatization appeal
Court Watch |
2012/07/25 14:58
|
An appellate court on Tuesday tossed out Attorney General Pam Bondi's request for a decision to uphold the proposed privatization of 29 South Florida prison facilities.
A three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal rejected her plea to reverse a lower court's ruling against privatization, saying Bondi couldn't appeal on her own after her client, the Department of Corrections, declined to do so. The panel unanimously dismissed the case because Bondi was not a party.
"A party who suffers an adverse judgment in Circuit Court has the right to appeal, but nonparties whose rights have not been adjudicated have no right of appeal," Chief District Judge Robert Benton wrote for the court.
Leaders of the Republican-controlled Legislature had urged Bondi to appeal after Gov. Rick Scott decided the department, which is part of his administration, would not.
One of Bondi's assistants acknowledged during oral argument last month that it was too late to carry out the privatization due to the expiration of a budget provision authorizing the plan. Nevertheless, Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Glogau asked the appellate court to issue a ruling upholding the privatization provision that would set a precedent for future budgets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal News RSS Feed
